0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¶Ç÷¸ð¼¼Æ÷ ±âÁõÀÚ ¹× ±âÁõ ±â°ü Àü¹®°¡µéÀÇ ±âÁõ °ü·Ã °æÇè: Æ÷Ä¿½º±×·ì ÀÎÅͺä

Experiences of Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem-cell Donors and Experts of Relevant Institutions

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 31±Ç 5È£ p.522 ~ 539
KMID : 0367020190310050522
À¯¼Ò¿µ ( Yu So-Young ) - Â÷ÀÇ°úÇдëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

±è¹Ì¿Á ( Kim Mi-Ok ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
±èűԠ( Kim Tai-Gyu ) - °¡Å縯Á¶Ç÷¸ð¼¼Æ÷ÀºÇà
¹ü¼öÈñ ( Beom Su-Hee ) - °¡Å縯Á¶Ç÷¸ð¼¼Æ÷ÀºÇà

Abstract

Purpose: This study attempts to explore the experiences of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donation (HSCD) amongdonors and experts of HSCD-related institutions in South Korea.

Methods: In July 2017, 7 donors and 8 expertswith experience of HSCD-related work were interviewed. The transcribed data were qualitatively analyzed toidentify major themes and sub-themes representing the experiences of the donors and experts.

Results: Theanalysis indicated that donors¡¯ HSCD-related experiences were structured into 5 themes (¡°Lack of understandingof HSCD¡±, ¡°Difficulty in decision-making regarding HSCD¡±, ¡°Major hassles involving HSCD¡±, ¡°Meaningfulexperiences and hopefulness¡± and ¡°More effort by government and institutions for future donors¡±). The experts¡¯experiences were structured into 4 themes (¡°Improving the donation procedure through government support¡±,¡°Improving the donation procedure through campaign reinforcement¡±, ¡°Donors¡¯ characteristics¡±, and ¡°Meaningof my job¡±).

Conclusion: HSCD-related institutions must manage donors more carefully. This would involve keepingthem aware of what they are likely to experience throughout the donation procedure, follow-up monitoring, andcontinuous support. Efforts should be taken to inform nurses involved in HSCD of research on donors¡¯ experiences,and they must be systematically trained to ease donors¡¯ difficulties.
KeyWords
Á¶Ç÷¸ð¼¼Æ÷, Æ÷Ä¿½º±×·ì, ÁúÀû¿¬±¸
Hematopoietic stem cells, Focus groups, Qualitative research
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed